With a ludicrously miserable 3.5l capacity, no bypass cooling or variable suction it's basically useless for almost all tasks required of a "proper" dust extractor. Whilst the new "smoother" nylon covered hoses have significant practical advantages in the worksite, this is countered by the almost universally reviled harder, stiffer bayonet hose end fitting, which nevertheless allow hoses to be readily & usefullyinterlinked for extra length.įestool's midrange & the small Kraenzle & Festool "hobby" ranges allow Sys fitment, but the midranges have ridiculous and wasteful hose garages fitted on top which are vulnerable to damage, and make Vac/Sys assemblies occasionally dangerously top-heavy & prone to tipping.įestool's CTLSys vac is nothing more than a simple, crude domestic vac shoved into a small Systainer. Amazingly so, in fact.įestool's "Pro" & Protool models don't actually allow Systainer fitment. They also fit & combine well with Oneida's Ultimate Dust Deputy cyclone/collecter ssystem into a tall, relatively top-heavy unit that all but eliminates the tendency for dustbag filling & filter fouling. Nobody else seems to offer reuseable bags these days: a key oversight in my opinion.įestools (& older Starmix/Metabos) fit Systainers on top. I have had one on my CT22 for the past 18 odd years, & another on an old SR5E/Wap Turbo/Stihl SE100 for even longer until the machine was nicked. The bags are quoted as being "good" for about 500 fill cycles, are machine washable (pref with an old tennis shoe) if & when the micropores become clogged & in my experienceseem to work well. Although almost criminally expensive, over the longer term they make economic sense. I really like Festool's Long life filters & bags. which combo of features is a best fit for one's own needs & priorities. I think it's up to the beholder which one suits best, i.e. All prof models seem to have 1 or 2 different key superior features. I doubt there's really a "perfect vac" out there. If Mafell ever releases a 120V version of their S-35M vac I'd consider it, primarily as a smaller, more compact companion to the Nilfisk. I REALLY like my Nilfisk, and am very excited to see that Timberwolf Tools now carries the line. Does your normal retail store or distributor carry accessories or consumables for either vac? Are you ok with a moderate capacity (Attix 33/Starmix), or do you want a larger capacity (Attix 44)? Do you prefer a slightly larger, more stable vac (Nilfisk) or a smaller, more compact vac (Starmix)? Ultimately, I think the vacs perform VERY similarly, and the choice would boil down to: The Starmix vac is more compact, similar in size to a CT-MIDI. The Attix 33/44 is comparable in dimensions to a Festool CT-36. The Nilfisk vac sold by Timberwolf ships with an antistatic hose, many of the licensed Starmix vacs ship with a non antistatic hose. It's a bit hit-or-miss on the Starmix vacs whether they'll have a docking station or not. The Nilfisk Attix 33/44 has a nifty docking station that accepts Systainers and L-BOXX containers. The front casters on the Nilfisk are rubber lined, double-locking and generally heavier duty than the hard plastic casters on the Starmix vacs The Nilfisk Attix 33/44 are slightly larger/longer than the Starmix, and if you get a Attix 44 you'll be getting larger capacity. The Nilfisk Attix 33/44 are GREAT vacuums, and compare very well with the Starmix vacs. I sold the Metabo and ultimately replaced it with a Nilfisk Attix 33, which in hindsight I realized should have been a "44" so I ordered the larger bin for it. The Starmix ISP-style vacs are GREAT! My challenge was that is was VERY difficult for me to acquire accessories for the vacuum, for instance fleece filter bags, hose parts, HEPA filters, etc. Hi Fred! I've previously owned a Metabo ASR 35 vacuum, which is a rebranded Starmix vac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |